Changing Role of Public Sector
At the time of Independence, it was
expected that the public sector
enterprises would play an important
role in achieving certain objectives of the
economy either by direct participation
in business or by acting as a catalyst.
The public sector would build up
infrastructure for other sectors of the
economy and invest in key areas. The
private sector was unwilling to invest
in projects which required heavy
investment and had long gestation
periods. The government then took it
upon itself to develop infrastructural
facilities and provide for goods and
services essential for the economy.
The Indian economy is in a stage
of transition. The Five Year Plans in
the initial stages of development gave
lot of importance to the public sector.
In the post–1990s, the new economic
policies, emphasised on liberalisation,
privatisation and globalisation. The role of public sector was redefined. It
was not supposed to play a passive role
but to actively participate and compete
in the market with other private sector
companies in the same industry.
They were also held accountable for
losses and return on investment. If
a public sector was making losses
continuously, it was referred to the
Board for Industrial and Financial
Reconstruction (BIFR) for complete
overhauling or shut down. Various
committees were set up to study
the working of inefficient public
sector units with reports on how to
improve their managerial efficiency
and profitability. The role of public
sector is definitely not what was
envisaged in the early 1960s or 70s.
(i) Development of infrastructure:
The development of infrastructure is a
prerequisite for industrialisation in any
country. In the pre-Independence period,
basic infrastructure was not developed
and therefore, industrialisation
progressed at a very slow pace. The
process of industrialisation cannot
be sustained without adequate
transportation and communication
facilities, fuel and energy, and basic
and heavy industries. The private
sector did not show any initiative to
invest in heavy industries or develop
it in any manner. They did not have
trained personnel or finances to
immediately establish heavy industries
which was the requirement of the
economy.
It was only the government which
could mobilise huge capital, coordinate industrial construction and train
technicians and workforce. Rail,
road, sea and air transport was the
responsibility of the government, and
their expansion has contributed to the
pace of industrialisation and ensured
future economic growth. The public
sector enterprises were to operate in
certain spheres. Investments were to
be made to:
(a) Give infrastructure to the core
sector, which requires huge
capital investment, complex and
upgraded technology, big and
effective organisation structures
like steel plants, power generation
plants, civil aviation, railways,
petroleum, state trading, coal,
etc;
(b) Give a lead in investment to the
core sector where private sector
enterprises are not functioning
in the desired direction, like
fertilizers, pharmaceuticals,
petro-chemicals, newsprint,
medium and heavy engineering;
(c) Give direction to future
investments like hotels, project
management, consultancies,
textiles, auto-mobiles, etc.
(ii) Regional balance: The government
is responsible for developing all regions
and states in a balanced way and
removing regional disparties. Most of
the industrial progress was limited to
a few areas like the port towns in the
pre-Independence period. After 1951,
the government laid down in its Five
Year Plans, that particular attention
would be paid to those regions which
were lagging behind and public sector industries were deliberately set up.
Four major steel plants were set up
in the backward areas to accelerate
economic development, provide
employment to the workforce and
develop ancilliary industries. This was
achieved to some extent but there is
scope for a lot more. Development
of backward regions so as to ensure
a regional balance in the country is
one of the major objectives of planned
development. Therefore, the government
had to locate new enterprises
in backward areas and at the same
time prevent the mushrooming growth
of private sector units in already
advanced areas.
(iii) Economies of scale: Where
large scale industries are required to
be set up with huge capital outlay,
the public sector had to step in to
take advantage of economies of scale.
Electric power plants, natural gas,
petroleum and telephone industries
are some examples of the public sector
setting up large scale units. These
units required a larger base to function
economically which was only possible
with government resources and mass
scale production.
(iv) Check over concentration of
economic power: The public sector
acts as a check over the private
sector. In the private sector there
are very few industrial houses which
would be willing to invest in heavy
industries with the result that wealth
gets concentrated in a few hands and
monopolostic practices are encouraged.
This gives rise to inequalities in income,
which is detrimental to society.industries were deliberately set up.
Four major steel plants were set up
in the backward areas to accelerate
economic development, provide
employment to the workforce and
develop ancilliary industries. This was
achieved to some extent but there is
scope for a lot more. Development
of backward regions so as to ensure
a regional balance in the country is
one of the major objectives of planned
development. Therefore, the government
had to locate new enterprises
in backward areas and at the same
time prevent the mushrooming growth
of private sector units in already
advanced areas.
(v) Import substitution: During the
second and third Five Year Plan period,
India was aiming to be self-reliant
in many spheres. Obtaining foreign
exchange was also a problem and it
was difficult to import heavy machinery
required for a strong industrial base.
At that time, public sector companies
involved in heavy engineering which
would help in import substitution were
established. Simultaneously, several
public sector companies like STC and
MMTC have played an important role
in expanding exports of the country.
(vi) Government policy towards
the public sector since 1991: The
Government of India had introduced
four major reforms in the public sector
in its new industrial policy in 1991.
The main elements of the Government
policy are as follows:
• Restructure and revive potentially
viable PSUs
• Close down PSUs, which cannot
be revived
• Bring down governments equity in
all non-strategic PSUs to 26 per
cent or lower, if necessary; and
• Fully protect the interest of
workers.
Comments
Post a Comment